America's Golden Calf

We have been snookered in just about everything but the kitchen sink in these last decades, why not the U.S. Constitution as well while we're at it?

Have we discovered America's Golden Cal?  ...and sitting right under our noses the whole time?

Was the Constitution written to intentionally take
us out of YHWH's graces and protection?

If you were criminally minded and were planning
 to build a tyrannical empire, you'd first have to
get rid of the God that would keep you from abusing His loyal people.
You'd somehow have to take all of these honest worshipers away 
from honoring their God, meaning specifically in your case
their well-known tyrant pummeling God, 
or the God of the universe.
So, knowing that you can't get this God to simply abandon 
those who are truly faithful to Him, you then have to give 
Him reason to walk away from such people (as satan 
did in the garden), by tricking God's otherwise 
loyal people into disobeying and disrespecting this God.   

Their God and His impenetrable protections would then
be forced to "give place" to the new "gods" that the 
people have chosen to rule over them 
where the criminal minded might then take over, 
nation by nation, enslaving the world.

But again you'd have to first get that God's
loyal people to denounce and/or belittle Him.

That God (by His own system of honoring His own Word)
would then rightfully not be able to defend
those who have replaced Him as their lawgiver
 and you could do whatever you wanted to do
to such 'voluntary' slaves from there on out.

Yes, just trick them into thinking that their 
accepted humanist, pluralist document is somehow aligned with
their God's Will and they'll ignorantly fall into a worship of themselves 
(themselves becoming the newly-created gods called "We the People"
and its then "clear sailing" for the new
slave masters!   ...as the people then have no clue 
why their God is no longer protecting them !

And here's the best part as a bonus for the criminal and his plan:
The people have no idea then, why their God is not coming to their rescue as their national

Have we been "bamboozled"?

situation only endlessly continues to get worse and worse, because again...  they've been tricked into thinking that their national documents are somehow also "inspired" by this same God as well, even though they have never really taken the time to read these documents with any diligence and/or seriously compare them to their God's Bible!

You then let the peasants prop up their blasphemous document all they want (although you still pretend that its yet a problem for your criminal empire that they want this document's "rights" as their saving power), yourself being the only ones who know that they 
are foolishly angering their God all the more.  The elite LOVE IT when folks cry out and protest for their "Constitutional rights" rather than call for a serious repentance to the true authority of their (tyrant pummeling) biblical God!  (See the booklet "Bullies for satan" for much more on this)

Are we stepping away from today's golden calf system?
If we all did, the criminal cabal system in this nation would likely collapse completely under its own weight almost the next day.
-dwaine




After all these morally-dwindling years of our American struggle to maintain a patriotic level of respect for what many of us thought was the last vestige of man-made homage to the Father in our nation, they have even taken that away from us as well, now that we know that even the U.S. Constitution was a smokescreen for the luciferians and their re-enslavement of the masses! (for those new to this, rough premliminary outline here in an outline patterned after some of our friend Ted Weiland's work, or his more complete audio series here)

Can we see our way clear to understanding this last layer of deceit without "losing it" altogether?  How many balloons must be burst for us in our rosy-colored lives before we, as mere mortals, feel that there is simply too much "upside-down stuff" to have to face now?

The truth about 9/11, the Federal reserve, the 501c3 church snare, the chemtrails, the vaccinations, the fiat money system, the birth certificates and the strawman lies were all hard enough to take for all of us, but now?  Even the Constitution is a deception from the pits of hell as well?

About eight or nine years ago, the curiosities began to sharply poke me in the conscience that something wasn't quite what it seemed to be with the Constitution.   But being a human document, I didn't think much of this feeling, knowing that man was imperfect.  So at first I just shrugged it off.

Over time, those nagging thoughts in my heart continued to grow.  Some initial thoughts were serious ones, which began to lure me away from my previously-held belief that the Constitution was somehow even "inspired by God".  

In the years to come, the progression of my catching on to this would start with wondering why they hadn't included the names of the Father and Son, and even more puzzling to me (knowing over those years that the sacred names were somewhat shrouded in the dark ages history) was the harder to understand fact that the Bible itself was never mentioned in this Constitution as any kind of referee method.  Yet little did I know those years back, that this was just going to be the tip of the iceberg for what would later come, and just as the prophecy of the Bible would surely have it fit right in at the most needful time in our own remnant's previous studies in the realm of law (or so it now seems) where the sprouts of a new kingdom of YHWH seems right around the corner for those who are truly tired of satan's imitation version of law.

We have already devoted some writings and shows pertaining to this subject of  "a Constitution born evil"  on this website, where the founder's dreaded disease of "Freemasonism" is exposed here to some depth, and where some of the law issues they corrupted for us are mentioned here and here, but the biggest part remains that I feel that I must start a page to just deal with the actual biblical problems with America's zombie-like obsession with the Constitution itself, thus this page on "America's Golden Calf".

I expect that this is surely going to be even a larger controversial subject than 9/11 was over the past few years, so I have a feeling that we are in for a really interesting ride if we choose to stand on this subject with the Messiah's instruction to not flinch as well.  Nonetheless, the results of being given the blessings of a biblically-solid replacement for our already completely disrespected Constitutional liberties is sounding nicer and nicer to me as every day goes by and we see the implosion of our present government becoming imminent.  (See also: “AMERICA IS DOOMED!” we hear them say! go here, then scroll down a bit)

Please bear with us as this section grows.   

Oh and...    We can always use help in either the national programs we have going, or in our local Pittsburgh area if any of you have a heart to do some volunteering in the spread of this great new hope of a renewed Puritan-styled "perfect law of liberty" for mankind (this is where other preachers would shamefully preach on how the sheep are supposed to help the one shepherding them, hint hint).

blessings in abundance and peace to men on earth through His soon coming kingdom,
dwaine



The following article (of which right off: please understand I do not support it due to its author's "religious neutral ground" imaginary premise, but is included here only as an example) shows the new, fast-growing buzz of discussion around the nation where the U.S. Constitution (and its surrounding documents) are becoming the center of attention of controversy, but keep in mind as you read this particular article, that the writers still don't know the deeper biblical/spiritual truths that you, my readers and listeners understand, and that is that the luciferians are called luciferians for a reason-- they live their lives according to the rule of lies not the rule of law, and consequently refer to their "god" (lucifer) in any deceptive way necessary, using names that cleverly try to sound like names that we would use for "God".  But now that we know about the dark ages "secret societies" and their intentional cover-up of the true sacred names "YHWH", "Yeshua", and Hebrew words like "Elohim", etc, having replaced them with their own terms to intentionally honor their "god", we can read this from a completely different vantage point and know that the luciferians still have somewhat of an upper hand with these types of less-studied folks, in that these authors likely still "think" that they are supporting the God of the Bible by the terms you will see them hailing below (which clearly illustrates how our forefathers were suckered into this nomenclature "metonymy" even back then), when they are in all actuality, using terms that the Freemasons, Illuminati, and Jesuits had concocted to "sound" biblical, but are actually "word art" terms honoring their god, satan.  Keep this in mind as you read this example that I have posted here, and see why the deeper truths and layers are so important to one who wishes to be on the right side of Yeshua's "line in the sand" before He arrives for His more "studied" remnant here soon.  -dwaine: 

The Constitution and the Candidates: Race, Religion, Romney, and Ryan

The four men facing off in the presidential election could only be there today because of how our Constitution has allowed America to evolve. Professor Akhil Reed Amar on what our constitution really says about religion and race.

by  | August 19, 2012 4:45 AM EDT

When the Philadelphia framers unveiled their proposed Constitution 225 years ago—September 17 will mark the official anniversary—most Americans were white Protestants. Anti-Catholicism ran deep, no Jews held high office, most blacks were enslaved, and the Church of Latter Day Saints did not even exist. Today, while America remains predominantly white and protestant, no white Protestant sits on the Supreme Court, which consists of five white Catholics, three white Jews, and one black Catholic. Among the four leading men now in the presidential/vice presidential spotlight, the only mainstream Protestant is black; two of the remaining three contenders are Catholic and one is Mormon. For this extraordinary evolution, credit the Constitution.

amar-constitution-pres-candidates-tease-embed

Antenna / Getty Images

The place where the Constitution meets religion and race remains a treacherous cultural battleground. This spring, the conservative political operative and self-styled historian David Barton hit the bestseller list with an audacious new book on Thomas Jefferson’s philosophy of church, state, and race.  Last week, Barton’s publisher unceremoniously withdrew this publication from store shelves, as scholarly evidence mounted that the book is bunk.

Barton’s fall is a cautionary tale about the perils of oversimplification. That said, here are three simple principles to remember regarding race, religion, and the Constitution.

Principle One: The Constitution is Not a Religious Document

Consider first what the Constitution’s pointedly does not say. Although the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, and several Revolution-era state constitutions had explicitly and prominently invoked God in their opening and/or closing passages, the federal Constitution conspicuously said nothing of the sort. Thus, neither the Preamble nor any other constitutional clause explicitly mentioned the “Creator” or “Nature’s God” or “the Supreme Judge of the World,” as had the Declaration of Independence and the New York Constitution of 1777 (which incorporated the Declaration); or “the Great Governor of the World,” as had the Articles of Confederation; or the “Great Governor of the Universe,” as had the Pennsylvania Constitution of 1776; or “the Great Legislator of the Universe, ... the Supreme Being, the great Creator and Preserver of the universe,” as had the Massachusetts Constitution of 1780.  The South Carolina Constitution of 1778 used the word “God” nine times—a word that explicitly appeared in every revolution-era state constitution save Virginia’s. But this word appeared nowhere in the federal Constitution—a pointed omission if ever there was one.

Consider next what the Constitution does explicitly say: “No religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.” As of 1787, almost every state did in fact use religious tests. Nine states incorporated these tests into the very texts of their written constitutions. So the Framers’ emphatic rejection of religious tests for federal office-holders was not business as usual. It was big news—a truly revolutionary New World idea whose reverberations powerfully resounded last weekend, with a Mormon and Catholic clasping hands as thousands of onlookers—mostly mainstream Protestants—clapped and cheered.

Consider, finally, one additional patch of constitutional text, specifically focused on the presidency. While most Founding-era state constitutions expressly included the phrase “so help me God” or some analogous reference to “God” in their obligatory oaths, the Article II presidential oath omitted all mention of God. This omission was surely pointed and purposeful, with the result that no duly selected president could be obliged to utter the word “God” or profess his belief in any supreme being.

A religiously neutral Constitution should not be confused with an anti-religious or anti-Christian Constitution.

True, the Constitution does specially privilege “Sundays” in a clause governing the ten-day window for presidential vetoes, but this provision was not expressly theological; and common days of rest can be justified on wholly secular grounds.

One textual arrow might seem to point in a different direction. Immediately preceding the thirty-nine famous signatures at the bottom of the 1787 parchment, we find the following words:  “done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth. In witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our Names.” [Emphasis added.]

At first blush, these words might seem to contradict the central meaning of the religious test clause and the presidential oath clause. After all, the Constitution requires federal officials to take an oath to the Constitution itself. If that document really does proclaim that Jesus Christ is “our Lord,” then isn’t this oath-taking itself an improper religious test?

As it turns out—though this fact has until now not been widely understood—the “our Lord” clause is not part of the official legal Constitution. The official Constitution’s text ends just before these extra words of attestation—extra words that in fact were not ratified by various state conventions in 1787-88.

What, then, are we to make of these words? Just this: The words “our Lord” are much like the words “so help me God” in presidential inaugurations. No president can be obliged to utter these words in his inauguration ceremony, but presidents may choose to add them, if they wish. Over the course of American history, many presidents (and most modern presidents) have in fact chosen to add these words. Similarly, the Constitution nowhere requires a president to swear his oath of office on a Bible, but a president can choose to do so—and almost all presidents, beginning with George Washington, have in fact done so. Similarly, the thirty-nine framers at Philadelphia were allowed to profess their faith even in the public square. Some signers with quill in hand likely gave no thought to the “Year of our Lord” language and its theological overtones. But other signers may well have mused on things eternal, and on their personal relationships to God, at the precise instant when they added their names to a plan that they hoped would sharply bend the arc of human history toward justice. All of which leads us to our next general principle:

Principle Two: The Constitution is Not an Anti-Religious Document

A religiously neutral Constitution should not be confused with an anti-religious or anti-Christian Constitution. Just as no unbeliever may be barred from federal service for his atheism, no true believer may be excluded for his abiding faith.

Many of those responsible for America’s Constitution were folk of deep faith. Bracket, for a moment, the Founding generation. Whether or not Barton and his fellow travelers succeed in establishing that the leading framers wore religion on their sleeves, surely the generation of reformers who arose to stamp out slavery and its vestiges brought their faith dramatically into the public square. First and foremost, abolitionists believed that slavery was ungodly—and eventually they succeeded in inscribing their abiding moral principles in the Constitution itself, in a trio of Reconstruction Amendments adopted after the Civil War. Long before Barton, Ralph Reed, Jerry Falwell, and others made clear the clout of America’s religious right, America’s religious left—the abolitionist generation—gave us the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments, the crown jewels of our Constitution.

And with these amendments in view, we see our final general principle:

Principle Three: The Constitution Includes More Than the Founding

Two hundred and twenty-five years ago, slavery, race discrimination, and/or religious tests prevailed in most states. Today, all races and religions stand equal before the law, and do so not because activist federal judges have plucked liberal constitutional principles out of thin air, but because We, the People of the United States, amended our Constitution after the Civil War to hold state governments to much higher standards of religious and racial equality. None of the four men who now stand atop the political pyramid could have scaled these heights had the rules of 1787, grand as they were for their time, remained unchanged. As America celebrates the Constitution’s 225th birthday, let’s give credit not just to the Founders but also to those later generations who, thank God, made amends for some of the sins of our fathers. 

Portions of this article are based on Akhil Reed Amar's forthcoming book, America’s Unwritten Constitution: The Precedents and Principles We Live By.

Editor's note: The original version of this article stated that most presidents chose to omit "so help me God" from the presidential inauguration. It should be most modern presidents.

©2011 The Newsweek/Daily Beast Company LLC


Now that you have read this, can you see what I mean?   Either the authors are directly working for the secret society circles as "freindly news-sources", trying to save what little "voting public" that they can of the awakening goyim, or they are ignorantly still yet in the fowler's snare, having not likely had the Holy Spirit to then better discern these deeper layers of truth.  In not using the Father and Son's real names, they show their ignorance either way in this article, Amen?  Notice also, that they clearly dont see the fake "neutrality" of the way they still yet see this document.  -dwaine



An excerpt from our friend Ted Weiland's thoughts on this Constitution issue.   I concur.   -dwaine

Dear Brethren,
My preaching and writing about the U.S. Constitution has not been about exposing the Constitution so much as it has been about promoting Yahweh’s law and advancing His kingdom. Following salvation and personal discipleship, these two issues should be paramount in everything we do as Christians. 

We have been called to be ambassadors of Yahweh and His kingdom (2 Corinthians 5:20). Consequently, we need to move beyond merely the understanding that Yahweh’s kingdom and laws are integral to the New Covenant (Colossians 1:12-13, Hebrews 8:8-10). We need to move into action and start taking some ground on behalf of our King. 




Would YOU want to have been found standing around the golden calf when Moses came down off the mountain?  Or would you want to be out of that line of fire?

How about today?

Imagine this authoritative loud voice coming down at you from above:

"WARNING WARNING: STEP AWAY FROM THE GOLDEN CALF!"

is that not the warning we are almost literally getting?   -dwaine



Consider this as well:  When we learned the story of the Exodus and the golden calf in the Bible as sunday school students, etc, many of us were curious as to why folks of the past would simply worship a cow or calf, right?  I mean, my thoughts as a child had been...  "Wow.  Its just a cow.  Who would be dumb enough to worship a stupid cow?"  and yet, knowing that I perhaps didn't yet fully understand what was going on in that story, I nonetheless let it rest in my mind, figuring that someday I might understand their motives with greater wisdom when I grew up.  Well, that long-awaited day is coming around as we are learning that the Egyptian system of society was not that much unlike how today we have half the American nation worshiping a donkey, and the other half worshiping an elephant.  Now that we not only know how to read their hyrogliphics but also know about the secret society underpinnings that today still follow this interesting golden calf nature to some extent, it seems their golden calf was what represented their pagan societal religious/law system, of which over time the ancient Israelites had gotten very accustomed to living under during their captivity.  Do we in America really "worship" the donkey and elephant  ...or do we say that they are just the symbols of the system by which we have been so successfully conditioned to trust in?  I would posit that because the entire system is built upon man-made laws, acts and legislated edicts that are also clearly based on humanism and pluralism, etc, that such edicts are without question in opposition to the Father's laws ("thou shalt not kill" vs. abortion, etc) whereupon the Father has all unequivocal justification to also classify our own donkey and elephant as being "worshiped" by those who today "dance around" these animals in support.   It is an idolatrous system, be these animals mere symbols in their eyes or not.

In having done more research on the ancient Egyptian society and Scripture, I am going to step out on a limb here and say that the Israelites at the foot of Mount Sinai (who had then themselves just been learning that they had been misled and were being called by Father's mercies to come out of their enslavement as we are today) were likely a lot like how Americans of today have become, which is that we in America have been learning that we too have been foolishly following a symbol (either a donkey or elephant in our case) that stands for a now fascist/socialist-type of society that we really should have never adopted in this so-called "biblical" nation either.  The 'golden calf' of Egypt had therefore simply represented their time's early societal equivalent to today's communist type socialism, being that time's tyrannical Egyptian system of "sharing the wealth" (with the greater wealth at the very top of course) where the now murmering slaves (in their minds) at least had a consistent promise of a bite of bread and a roof over their heads each day for their labors.  In the long trek of the Israelites travelling in the wilderness, the transition to what might have been complete freedom of providing for ones' self was likely too much for most of the then "conditioned slaves" to handle, and in knowing no other way, they began to yearn to go back to the consistencies of their "golden calf-conditioned" consistent lifestyles, not yet having understood the Father's better system of law and justice at that point.  

There were probably minor skirmishes and abrasive issues for these travelers after leaving Egypt where a problem resolving golden calf system might have been little more in their minds than a near instinctive reaction to these issues, and I would think it to be especially true in trying to find peace between clashes of naturally occurring groups like perhaps for example those of the more amply productive Israelites vs. the less resourceful or less-productive Israelites as they travelled across the wilderness, and before reaching Sinai, they had little if any idea of the law system of their forefathers from the times before the captivity in Egypt, and thus the multitides of the less fortunate perhaps wanted some fairness or (as they were likely used to viewing it) governmental "law and justice" in their midst, looking to the only system of such fairness that they knew at the time, "the golden calf system".   

This inanimate image would have been like our modern donkey or elephant.  The more productive of them would have likely sided with Moses and the Levites, while the multitudes of those who were used to the constant provisions of the past slave masters (and perhaps those not as inventive, resourceful or motivated), likely at times yearned to be back in their previous slave like system due to the fact that their modest provisions would come every day without them being expected to try and find new ways to attain food as this new life in the wilderness was now challenging every individual with.

Today's similarly conditioned Americans can't stop dancing around their donkey or elephant in a similar fashion (can't let go of all of their own various benefits in today's top-down [criminal] "socialist-security" provision system), and as perfectly conditioned republicans, democrats or even "paper calf" (independent) "partakers" of our own overall 'golden calf' criminal system they keep blaming one or the other (as they've been trained to do by the elite) for all of the chaos and turmoil that is now taking place as a result of this now-imploding system.  The already alert of us are instead trying to beat the coming chaos to the gate and wake as many remaining people as possible to the fact that the entire system of satanic enslavement and its willing partakers is the problem, not just one party of it or the other.  Perhaps we can wake enough of them before famines or shooting wars begin.  The results of properly "preaching the kingdom of God" as Yeshua Himself called us to do, is to successfully educate and rally our time's Scripturally-ignorant people around the concept of that "Book of the Law" again, in an embracing of the Father's true law and justice system, hoping to bring about a peaceful, wholesome, free lifestyle under YHWH once and for all.

But they have to first "come out from among" satan's entire false system just as the Israelites had to "choose sides" in Exodus chapter 32, "shaking loose their bonds", denying themselves of all the obvious benefits of the beast's criminal enticements of both state and church.  Those who are still dancing around their state/church system will not be spared the Father's anger in any way [ 2016 UPDATE NOTE: just as the Israelites who rebelled against YHWH's law over their forty year wandering period had to all die off (were "consumed" KJV) before the true remnant nation would cross the Jordan into the land of milk and honey; see Joshua 5:6]. Remember that it is for this very reason of our unfaithfulness to Father's system that we are being sent this wrath in the first place.  Let me elaborate:

Unless we then wake the others to come out from among this beast, the numbers of those from our families who will then be hid from the coming bloodshed will be small.   The sooner we all step away from this wicked system, the sooner the Father might have mercy on us as a nation.  So those who are not taking any time to hear about these issues as to why we need such biblical reform (especially the so-called preachers and church leaders who should have been the first ones to be doing so and who are only acting like Jesuits themselves)...   should be publicly shamed, as they are a big part of the problem holding back the Father's mercies for this nation (see article), not the elite, as the elite were sent to punish those very people who refuse to repent in the first place, where then we and our loved ones have to suffer along with them till these "troublemakers" do wise up.

Many modern churches and preachers will often just smile and say something like, "live and let live" regarding all of those who are still sinning in outright arrogance towards the Father.  But think about this: If a nation of you were suddenly forced to live in a gun powder processing plant and others were carelessly tossing lit matches around "having fun" all around you, how long would it take before the smarter of you might wrestle such immature and irresponsible people to the ground to save your loved ones?  Its no different here my friends, for as I just mentioned, its the willfully ignorant and the impenitent that are the ones that are really calling this wrath of God down upon us, not the elite, as the elite are actually and presently just the decided punishment that is now being sent upon those nations who are refusing to repent and reform their people, nation, and churches.      

If we can't shame the outright ungodly we know, and if we haven't been working to rebuke the many obvious sinners in our neighborhood...     Can we really blame the Father if a powder keg then goes off in our midst, as is about to happen to us now?  --the likes of which we've surely never seen before?   

Idolatry is no different a sin my brothers, its a sin just like all the others.   In fact the Father seems to hate idolatry more than the other sins, evidenced by the way the Bible shows how He dishes out His wrath for it in so many cases throughout history.  The multitudes of lukewarm and antinomians still don't think the situation serious enough to repent of their disdain for Father's law.  And although they are the ones that this wrath is clearly first intended for (those professing to be of the house of God but who also won't reform their house; see Ezekiel 9:4-7), it is still we who may have to watch them all suffer, being themselves those who "would not that [the King of kings] should reign over them".    Are we really ready for Luke 19:27 and its coming mass carnage?  Remember: The elite want a shooting war, and both the heathen and the lukewarm are falling right into this trap just like Isaiah 31:1-3 says will happen to those trying to fight the beast without the Father's counsel or blessings.  If you're already helping to awaken these people as we are, then know that our prayers are already with you my brethren.  If not, then our prayers are that you will be able to speak boldly as Paul sought the strength for in Ephesians 6:19,20.

-dwaine


"...Repent: for the kingdom (government) of heaven is at hand."

-Yeshua in Matthew 4:17





man's progress against God's Will


The unstudied Christian on his way to praise the Constitution at his local town hall (without the Father's blessings), and wondering why he's not able to save the country after so many years of trying to do it this way.

(click on image for animation)


They refuse to believe that their man-made document is a part of the problem.

The Father is offering us again here lately, more wonderful advice and information to prove what I have increasingly been trying to say for a few years now, but rather than "having a love for the truth" (2 Thessalonians 2:8-12) where folks might have eagerly wanted to look into what we have found and what the Bible might have to say about this, they simply repeat blanket statements that they were successfully conditioned to say by the powers to be, thereby automatically and sadly defending their (make-believe) two (or three) party servant system. The same system that the servants laugh at anymore, etc, and they therefore do not see the real spiritual war behind all of this. 

Therefore this will play out just as the Bible had warned for those who are too wise and too busy for Father's ways, where just as the Bible says, they are "willfully ignorant" (intentionally avoiding what the Father is saying about such things).

In having received a growing number of emails of despair and doom and gloom from folks all over the nation who's plans are failing and who (at the same time) don't want to stop idolizing their man-made (and thereby contradictory law system and humanist solutions) please note that I am not "chastening" you here, but would only suggest to you then, that you are only causing me to feel sorry for you when you send me those messages of despair, even if you are just perhaps speaking out loud to me in hopes that I will agree with your sorrow, as you continue wondering why your unbiblical plans are not working in your corner of the world. But this does nothing but make me realize that whatever little love you may have for YHWH is perhaps only lip service for my sake at best (again, perhaps). 

One had written me claiming that "the Bible is about good and evil", but yet that same soul holds an immovable stance on America's man-made document of "good v. evil" laws instead of stopping to consider Father's document of good v. evil Laws whereby they might actually then compare the two to see who they actually honor. Those who are (just like Acts 19:28) crying out, "Great is the Constitution of the Americans" are doing just what the writers of that document wanted their slaves to do all along, where they are thereby living in their double-think world of believing that Christ can be your savior, but "man's legislation and politics is your ( - ahem - ) more reliable savior". Have they not even seen by their servants arrogance that their man made laws don't even have any "power" behind them anymore?

Those folks are missing the "higher power" picture of that "good and evil" that they say the Bible speaks of, that warns us in dozens of places against putting our trust in "man's solutions" as if man and his law-repairing skills are somehow going to be one's salvation.

The Constitution in not just unbiblical, it supports another religion altogether (and this even bolstered by a supreme court ruling from 1961). 

But if folks don't want to hear about this, then that is their choice, as their man-made documents are doing exactly as they were designed to do—trick them into subconsciously thinking man knows better than YHWH when it comes to "good and evil".

Consider this passage:
"Because they had not executed MY judgments, but had DESPISED MY statutes ... wherefore I gave them also statutes that were NOT GOOD, and judgments whereby they SHOULD NOT LIVE." (Ezekiel 20:24,25, emphasis mine, simply put: those who do not get back to YHWH's laws will not live through the judgment that is coming.)

We, on the other hand, are getting very excited about what we see on the horizon. But if its that much of an annoyance to the rest of you to serve YHWH with all eagerness of heart, then you are only making the Father even angrier at you guys.

-dwaine  aug 24, 2012


Simply put:

We now know that the U.S.Constitution was written so that the satanic elite could be evil to us.

Today, that same Constitution is being ignored and tossed aside by that same family of satanists because it doesn't allow them to be evil ENOUGH to us now.

It is therefore time to re-establish the seriousness of the Puritan values and the Law system we now again recognize as having more power than their god's system... 

...and endorse and implement that system...

YHWH's Bible.

-dwaine  aug 27, 2012


Now that we know what we know about the Constitution and the intention of it’s Masonic framers, and… now that we see them ignoring every viable and reasonable court proceeding we have ever learned, perhaps now the naysayers that have been opposing me for lo these many years will finally begin to admit that its not the politicians and the law experts that are going to stop this, but He that still sits on the throne as judge over all the universe, …YHWH!!! (perhaps that fanatic Dwaine wasn’t so stupid after all!)

And… Now that we know they could care less about our knowledge and accurate court proceedings and now that we also know that they seem to be banking on the “power” of their system, and even though I have personally spoken to Ron Paul and the others I will mention and feel that they even seem to be sincere in their beliefs in many ways, are guys like Rod Class or Gordon Hall going to be able to save us? How about Ron Paul, the occupy movement, or Edwin Viera? …are they going to save us? No. They don't have the enforcement power that my YHWH does my friends!

In the Movie, “A Lamp in the Dark” please note the way that the Jesuits are always angrily trying to squash and destroy the Bible, even banging their fists down on it in one scene. Why do they not do this to the Constitution if it is so much against their plans as the powers-to-be say it is, hmmm? I’ll tell you why, because the Constitution is one of their documents!!! That’s why! It’s so unbiblical that it can’t be blessed and enforced by YHWH upon anyone who admires or worships it, or even just counts on it to be their salvation!

-dwaine  sep 8, 2012

 
Sadly, many American idolators would rather fall on their swords, than fall on their Bibles.

-dwaine  sep 20, 2012


Ċ
Dwaine Moore,
Aug 21, 2012, 4:32 PM
Ċ
Dwaine Moore,
Nov 14, 2012, 2:15 PM
Ċ
Dwaine Moore,
Sep 2, 2012, 6:25 PM